We are told something like that human kind has been on this planet for some 4 million years or so.
The latest find in Turkey of Gobekli Tepe is dated to around 12,000 years ago - and is the earliest sign of civilisation being here?
Isn't there an awful lot of human history that is unaccounted for? For those of an open mind - here is something to take into consideration maybe?
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_251
It is around paragraph 48 that it starts proper with the history of this earth. It pretty much then sounds like Star Wars - Stargate kind of saga.
But then it does fill you in on the early history of our solar system - and more details about Atlantis - which is tied to that of Mu.
How that at this early time - we had a goldilock zone around our Sun of 3 habitable planets. That of our Earth, Mars and Malona (or Phaeton). Remember our Sun would have been much hotter. Atlantis and Mu started off as being friendly towards each other - of advanced technology - but over time grew apart to become mortal enemies. War resulted in the destruction of Malona (now the asteroid belt) - the atmosphere being ripped from Mars and the destruction of Mu and Atlantis (Gobi desert and Florida?) on Earth.
Is this a believable account? There are some things that need explaining - as far as basic astronomy goes.
Something I like to mention first - not tied to the above events, etc is the presence of our Moon around our Earth. That it should not be here at all. The reason being is - that if you list all the moons in our solar system - our Moon is a very strange oddity indeed. Let's take a quick tour. Mercury and Venus have no moons. We have our large Moon. Mars has two so-called moons - but when you look at them - they hardly fit the description of being Moons at all - but appear to be like captured asteroids. Next comes Jupiter and Saturn with their many moons - though being gas giants. The other outer planets have Moons also. Our Moon would not look out of place being around Jupiter, Saturn or any of the outer planets. And that is likely to be where it came from. That somehow it was changed in it's orbit to eventually take it's place around our Earth. This would have been a very long time ago - because life adapted to the presence of the Moon - indicating how long it has been here.
There is obviously a planet missing between Mars and Jupiter - because of their size differences and their orbits - and with the asteroid field conveniently here - surely this is a destroyed planet? How come something so obvious is neglected by scientists - who seem to insist that there's not enough mass in the asteroid field to have formed a planet - or for that matter about our Moon - saying it always was here - since the creation of the Earth. Why doesn't Mars have a proper Moon at all? Or why do Mercury and Venus are likely missing Moons too?
Someone did say that the orbits of planets around our Sun - do compare to that of electrons around a nucleus - that they do relate. That electrons can change their orbit - and so why not planets around our Sun? That they are not fixed as such - and are changeable.
Anyway I am saying that simple logic - and noting the presence of patterns can help explain the data. We didn't know that much about the Moons in our solar system - but have learned a lot about them through the exploration of spacecraft sent out into the solar system.
Modern mankind are not the only ones with knowledge of the planets and our Moon. Something found on an ancient Greek shipwreck is called the Antikythera mechanism. It was found in 1900 but no one recognized what it was at first. When X-rays became normal in use - it was then x-rayed to reveal what it really was. It's only in our modern times has it been reconstructed to give a clear idea of what it really is. A so-called 2000 year old computer device that charts the orbits of Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn, and the phases of the Moon. You would not expect such a sophisicated mechanical device like this to be present in ancient Greek times.
As far as the history of the human race on this Earth - I think that the explanation that the various distinct races came from other parts of the galaxy because of how different constellations are revered in different cultures. The ones that come to mind - are the Pleiades, and Sirius B - the later is via the Dogons, an African tribe who says it's not a visible star as such - which astronomers have confirmed.
Most people do not know the life cycle of a human being. For me, reincarnation makes the most sense - without karma. To say karma applies - makes this Universe far more complicated than it needs to be. It makes more sense that karma doesn't exist - that we're responsible for our own actions and problems - which we ourselves have to fix. I don't think the Buddhist view makes sense - about escaping from reincarnation is possible - I think it's more like - that is how intelligent life forms operate. That this is what we do.
Religions give the most unbelievable explanation(s) - there is no evidence nor logic to what they say - and they will certainly not admit nor own up to anything - when asked?